ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66

Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I bought the 686 + and … If you're going to shoot 357 with an regularity, the GP100. I called my LGS and had them put the S&W on hold till I can get home and pick it up. I have the 6" gp100 and I love it. We put two iconic revolvers together to compare and contrast differences and similarities. -Benjamin Franklin. Only when the trigger was fully-depressed in a firing stroke would the transfer bar rise and allow hammer to strike it and “transfer” that impact to the rear of the firing pin, discharging the chambered round. Ruger GP100 22 VS Smith 617. Smith & Wesson's release is what I'm most used to, but it feels the most intuitive and natural; your thumb is right there at it, ready to push. I'm not impressed with the finish on the new 66. Not saying this is the case in all of them, but there you go. His other 4" and my 2.5" have never had any problems though. Jesus Christ carries a GP100 with a 6" barrel. Press J to jump to the feed. These are all 357 Magnum revolvers. I always had Ruger 357's in magnum revolvers but wanted to buy a S&W based on the overwhelming comments about the better DA & SA. They comprehensively looked at the sometimes fragile and hand fitted lockwork of these designs, and in usual Ruger fashion, over-engineered all the working parts. I just hope other people got one better finished than mine was. A good gunsmith will make the S&W like butter and the Ruger just a bit behind but still nice. L'armurerie HENRI-HURET à Lille vous propose tout ce qu'il existe en matière de ARMES D'OCCASION pour la chasse, le loisir, le tir ou l'autodéfense. I was comparing the GP-100 against the S&W 686 and the Taurus model 66. He also has a S&W 686 and a 28-2, the Ruger is still his favorite. Smith will have a better trigger, although the ruger is serviceable and will get better with use. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. They are also usually razor-edged at the rear of the cylinder, requiring a light chamfer to ease the use of speedloaders. 1 Posts . I had a 6" full under lug gp100 until I sold it to a family member. Cast saves costs but anytime you cast you may or may not have air pockets that could crack so they tend to be not as strong as forged steel. The S&W is larger and heavier, making it more suitable for outdoor carry and a better choice for higher-pressure loads. I've owned and own both SW and Ruger revolvers and heads up the SW's are more accurate, better made, with vastly better triggers IMO. Playing next. Close. Won't be for any serious duty; maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but mostly for the range. My Security Six kicks ass. Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson 686. The MC is a solid recommendation. Soon after I bought my own and still have it to this day. That is the essence of a good deal! A few friends into revolvers generally seems to prefer S&W's but I've been reading positive reviews on the GP100 Match Champion so I'm starting to get interested. 08-16-2012, 12:55 PM. The GP-100 will handle the warmest loads you can buy or handload. They use the most modern of manufacturing methods, that of precision investment casting, much as would a jeweler or dental lab, to provide a near-final-sized raw part which thus requires a minimum of machining to become a completed arm. Price wise, the Ruger costs a bit less although guns in general are expensive where I'm from. I've narrowed it down to the 686 vs GP100. Hausse réglable LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON modèles : 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 - 625... Plus d'infos. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. I wouldn't want to shoot hundreds of rounds of magnums out of either gun (low fun factor IMO), but the SW will be plenty strong enough for occasional practice with full magnum loads, lots of practice with 38 special loads, and carrying for defense with full magnums. It probably will outlive me many times over. 1:45. We compare the Ruger GP 100 Match Champion to the Smith and Wesson 686. Answer Save. However, the Ruger engineers took a good look at the competition’s designs and followed another path to ensure the new gun’s durability. Notice the smith is a k frame, I wouldn't run a steady diet of the classic .357 load through it. 5 years ago | 118 views. Notice the smith is a k frame, I wouldn't run a steady diet of the classic .357 load through it. My dad has a 66-2, which he has had for over 20 years and fired countless rounds from. The GP100 is regarded as the strongest double action .357 magnum made, right up there with the smith N frame. With the Match Champion Ruger dressed to the nines, in terms of features, does it finally dethrone Smith & Wesson as the king of revolvers? Could have lightened the DA down more I think but I was short-stroking it. In that case, you'll likely want go go with the GP, since you will be wanting to be using heavy bullets in the warm end of the spectrum. Still have the 5" and did a trigger polish with springs. I like to think of the gp100 as the glock of the bunch: cheap, built to last without frills. The ruger trigger is mushy and sloppy. Thirty years on and a good used Security Six can be had in the lower $300 price range. Here is a comparison between 4 357 magnum revolvers. Vous trouverez une large gamme de produits pour répondre à votre besoin I eventually sold that, thinking maybe revolvers just weren't for me, then by chance I rented a gp100 and fell in love. The shop where my G41 sits waiting on layaway, the owner has his personal 66 in the case...might have to fondle it. Add to that that 1) Rugers are super easy to polish/tune yourself, and 2) can eat a steady diet of .357 Mags and not loosen and Ruger's the winner to me. The GP100 was the successor to Ruger’s Security Six … I've recently been considering picking up a Smith M66 because it's a beautiful gun, but then I saw the Ruger GP100 Match Champion. The ruger is built like a tank, but the 66 is the stainless "combat magnum." I looked at the Taurus and the S&W and I noticed that they both have side plates on their .357 magnum revolvers. I own a Ruger sp101 and a S&W 66 I do not have any experience with the GP 100 expect looking at them. I find myself on the horns of a dilemma. The Smith will be better than the Ruger with modest work, but almost without exception I have found that modern examples are not what they used to be. That thing is gorgeous. They also offset the locking bolt notches on the cylinder to provide added strength to that most-thin area of each chamber. between the Ruger GP100 and and S&W; 686 revolver (both chambered in .357 mag), which is the better deal? Both with a 4 inch barrel and the 66 being $700 the GP100 is $600. Nearly. Then spend the difference on buying ammo. Smith and Wesson built the 1st 44 magnum and Ruger followed fast with the Flat Top Blackhawk. Joined: Aug 24, 2008 Messages: 1,231. Ruger arms are also made of very good, fully heat treated steels. Keith and Skelton were also involved in the development of the 41 Magnum for law enforcement and hunting. Stronger build, better customer service, better overall quality, a no brainer in my opinion. 7. Hausse réglable LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON modèles :586- 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 -... Plus d'infos. A battle of the Titans so to speak. Hopefully some folks out there have tried out the new Ruger GP100 22. razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016 … This will double as a range gun, and a close range whitetail and critter gun. I have owned both the model 66-8 and a gp100. Takes too much wasted motion and effort to open quickly. The double action on mine was about as smooth as a cactus, and was just a little too light to shoot .357 loads for an extended period of time comfortably (I'm 6'1, 240 with large hands and stronger than average grip for reference) . Réf : LPATXT0407 en stock. I once knew of an indoor range that had one as a rental gun and it digested, by their estimate, some 1,400,000 rounds with no parts breakages and minimal maintenance. While I admire the way their engineers over-built the revolver’s internals, and knowing that they were attempting to bulldoze their way into the marketplace via cost competitiveness by eliminating hand work, in my opinion the Security Six is a “single-action revolver capable of double-action firing.” Generally, the single-action pull is nothing to write home about either, usually at least four pounds with some creep, compared to the 2-3 pound triggers standard on period Colts or Smiths. However, and this is the real reason why these guns are a solid buy, they will simply out last any other DA revolver over thousands of Magnum rounds. 100.00 € Ajouter au panier. It’s a toss up and the differences are minimal but Rugers are cast steel while S&W are forged steeel. It'll outlive your grandkids, and easy to strip. Archived. Hausse LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON TXT0407. Tags: None. A prior owner had taken the factory walnut “target” stocks and cut finger-grooves into their front and reduced their overall girth, making them suitable for smaller hands, but very slippery with the not-inconsiderable recoil of a full-house .357 round. If you have a little more cash, S&W is worth it. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger LCR and Smith & Wesson M&P Bodyguard 38 This is a table top review and comparison of the Smith & Wesson Model 686, Ruger GP100 and the Taurus Model 627 Tracker. Sturm Ruger’s answer to the Smith & Wesson 686, the Ruger GP100 was introduced in the early 1990s. 4. It's still extremely accurate, locks up tight, and functions smoothly. Been loving mine since the mid 80s. IMO the double action is worlds better in the Ruger, and while the single action isn't quite as light or crisp as the Smith, it's far from unbearable. Shooting .357 out of it felt very mild and controllable. User account menu. Ruger chambers are usually a bit oversized, easing extraction when dirty, if compromising case life somewhat. It is pretty brutal shooting hot .357 out of the S%W. I give you my thoughts and the impressions of 3 other shooters. A place for responsible gun owners and enthusiasts to talk about guns without the politics. Plus I actually already have an M&P R8 on order so I'm thinking to try Ruger again. Otherwise ouch, baby. Recently went thru a similar situation, S&W vs Ruger.. I can easily hit a coyote at 100 yards. It probably will outlive me many times over. Close. Ruger GP100. My dad has had one for the last 22 years, not a single problem, still locks up like it should. Keith and Phil Sharpe were much more involved with the development of the 357 Magnum which was a pet project of Doug Wesson. The frame, cylinder release, sideplate, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S&W. The 686 first debuted in the 1980’s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681.Since then, th… I had been himming and hawing for a bit now lol all my other revolvers have been Taurus products but for this one I wanted to go better quality (you guys are rubbing off on me) Anyway pics when i pick it up. 100.00 € Ajouter au panier. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. First, the engineers bulked up key frame dimensions, including the height of the frame, the thickness of the top strap and barrel shank support and the cylinder diameter. Won't be for any serious duty; maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but mostly for the range. Posted by 3 years ago. when I go hunting. I'm in the market for a solid revolver and I've been bouncing between these two for quite some time. If one bought a Security Six, one could expect a lifetime of full use and still be able to hand it to one’s children with nary a problem. Between the two, Ruger. My LGS has both the S&W 66 and Ruger GP100 in stock. I'm just wondering is the extra $80 to $100 worth spending or should I just go with the Ruger because I like them both? My collection is in sore need of a full-sized wheelgun in .357 Magnum. I own a S&W 60 and I say get the Ruger. Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016. Kind of depends on what you'll use it for. Question. Learn it, know it, live it - Brad Hamilton, http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701268.pdf, Buffalo Bore Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, HSM Bear Load Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, Federal Premium® Vital-Shok® Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, Second Media Corp., 111 Peter Street, Suite 901, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada. I like both of these pistols but have no Idea what one to purchase. While this added to the cost of production, it means that the finished arm generally needs no trigger action job to make the stroke smooth from front to back. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. Log in sign up. Major ouch. How does the new Ruger GP100 22 compare with the Smith 617? The GP100 with a Wolf Spring kit has an awesome trigger. Question. My 2 choices were the 686 plus 3" and the 66 Combat 2.75". The downside- it can beat itself to death if you shoot to many hot 125's through it. A somewhat blunter instrument, the Ruger GP100 also dates back to the 1980s, replacing the Security Six in 1985. For the purpose you list, I'd vote GP100 as well. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger LCR and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum Voncile Harwood. However, most shooters were willing to accept this for the strength and price paid. I can't remember the last time I shot a Ruger revolver (but I have four of their semiauto's) Sarge01 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Join Date: Jan 2010; Posts: 4346; Share Tweet #2. The trick is shoot .38's n practice, and a few .357's and you'll be fine, and stay away from 125's. I'm going to vote SW if you can swing the extra cost. By Garrett Lucas. My first .357 revolver was the 66-8, and honestly I just didn't like it. If I had to go with a large revolver for a survival situation, the GP100 would be my choice. It's come down to an S&W 66 and the Ruger GP100. Both were so-called “medium-frame” revolvers, in much the same vein as a Smith & Wesson K-frame, or the Colt D-frame, exemplified by the Diamondback. Thanks for the input guys. In addition, the Ruger folks incorporated a transfer bar firing system. Plus the extra heft of the gp100 made extended shooting of .357 not only bearable, but enjoyable. I can't decide which one to get gentleman; the Smith and Wesson 686 is about $600 and the Ruger GP100 is about 520. 21 … If you're going to shoot almost exclusively 38 Special, potentially carry the gun, or prefer a light and elegant gun (as I do), a Model 66 is the better choice. Plus, on my particular gun, it would get dirty very quickly (<100 rounds) and half of the cylinder would be harder to cock/work in double action. JavaScript is disabled. I like it a lot more than the Ruger (which is also a great gun), and I honestly like it even more than my Python when it comes to actually shooting it. Double action: I hate to admit it but, with the new springs installed, the Ruger edges out the Smith and Wesson. Have owned GP100s in 4", 5" and 6". Smith and Wesson 686 vs Ruger GP100. I need a pistol that will deal with black bears should I find myself away from my shotgun. 1 of 13 Ruger GP100 vs. S&W Model 69. 7. Two of the newest five-shot, medium-framed .44s—the Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson Model 69—duke it out. You'll be rewarded with a nicer shooting, better feeling gun. Smith and Wesson 686 vs Ruger GP100. This means long component life. I have one and I love it. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. In this instance, the L frame of the 686 denotes a medium-large frame, and is typical of modern, fullsize .357 Magnum offerings from Smith & Wesson. I will probably have to fit other stocks affording me a more secure grip, as it squirms beyond my ability to hold it consistently. Archived . The Ruger has notable glitches in its DA pull. All three nice revolvers. But the Ruger is built like a tank and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism. I'll take the Ruger any day of the week. Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson 686. Shooting with .357 Magnum: I usually carry .38 +P instead of .357 Mag. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. Full house .357 magnum isn't terrible with double protection. The extra weight will make it much easier on your hands. If I had to do it again, I'd go for the 4" version balance wise. The GP100 reflects Ruger design ethos as much as the Smith 686 is a pure child of Smith and Wesson. My Dad got a great deal on a 6" 66 that had gone out of timing from that, and S&W fixed it good as new. If one were to do a comparison detail strip of a Smith, Colt and the Ruger, one would see that pieces such as the cylinder locking bolt, the hand, the size of the double and single-action sears on the hammer, one would see that the Ruger pieces are quite a bit larger. I find that I can usually shoot it more accurately. On the Colt release, I use my right index finger and thumb, and sort of pinch it as I pull. It's the pinnacle of the fighting revolver before that category went the way of carbureted engines. The GP100 is regarded as the strongest double action .357 magnum made, right up there with the smith N frame. I like the classic lines of the Smith K-frame and the trigger is so smooth. It oughta be a good pistol to you. I like the classic lines of the Smith K-frame and the trigger is so smooth. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I have a stainless 6" GP100, and my slogan for it is "Rick Grimes can suck it.". Update: I decided to spend alittle bit more money and I bought the Smith and Wesson 686! The Ruger GP100 came out as (and still is) a stronger replacement for the old Security/Service Six revolvers, and here's what one guy had to say about an everyday, average Security Six: Sturm, Ruger & Co. has always been a bit of a dichotomy of a gun company. It probably will outlive me many times over. While both S&W and Colt used rebounding hammers to provide a drop safety scheme and S&W had added the sliding hammer block in 1943 to WWII production “Victory Models” and subsequently carried this change into civilian production post-war, Ruger felt that the use of a rising "transfer bar" of steel interposed between the flat-faced hammer and the frame-mounted firing pin was even safer. I want a … Press J to jump to the feed. Having a 12-13 pound DA trigger pull seems about average. A forum community dedicated to Springfield Armory XD and XD-M series firearm owners and enthusiasts. Browse more videos. Wheelgunners of reddit, what are your thoughts? It's come down to an S&W 66 and the Ruger GP100. 1 fallling block sporting rifles and the Gold Label side-by-side shotguns. While doing so however, they have embraced neo-classic aesthetics in their arms; examples include the their Blackhawk single-action revolvers, the M77 bolt action and No. Hey all. S&W 686 vs Ruger gp100. Posted by 3 years ago. I'd also say it depends on its purpose. - Theodore Roosevelt. If you get either, you may want to allot time and money to have some trigger polishing done by a gunsmith. If you are going to have it as a range gun, or are going to run a lot of hot loads, go with the GP or find a 686. Smith will have a better trigger, although the ruger is serviceable and will get better with use. Follow. How are each of them on trigger pull,accuracy, ruggedness,and value. The frame itself dispensed with the usual side-plate design and the piece is easily “field-stripped” for detail cleaning of the lockwork. Colt’s hand fitting and S&W’s selective-assembly methods meant that revolvers were fitted to the dimensional accuracy of the trigger and hammer pin locations on the frame. Single action: The Ruger is much improved but the Smith and Wesson is like glass. Theyre both good guns but the trigger on S&Ws is way better. But pray you never have to shoot a .357 indoors. Discussion Starter • #1 • Apr 27, 2018. But the Ruger is built like a tank and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism. That it has no side plate. Get the 66, if you love it half as much as I do, it will be totally worth it. (With the exception, of course, of Ruger’s follow-on piece, the GP-100.) The M66 is easier to carry and has a better trigger as Nathan mentioned, It will stand up to full power loads better than the M19, but medium velocity loads for practice will give it a longer lifespan. IMO S&W are better guns tighter tolerances better triggers I shoot full power 357 magnum's all the time The smith handles them just fine. I noticed though, in the description for the Ruger, that they talk about their solid one piece frame. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger SP101 2.25" and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum Smith and Wesson 686 vs. Ruger GP100 357? S&W 686 vs Ruger gp100. Ruger vs. Smith & Wesson and Taurus revolvers? Security Sixes were generally .357s and had adjustable rear sights, while Speed Sixes were fixed sight guns that were made primarily in .357, but also in .38 S&W Special and 9mm Luger. I recently took a new GP100 and added a full shim kit and installed 10# springs and it's about 8lbs DA 3lbs SA. In the early 1970s, when the double-action revolver was still the preference of most US law enforcement agencies, Ruger did not have a weapon to compete for this market, nor for civilian home protection users. The Ruger GP100 may be one of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list. Most people say "Go Smith for craftsmanship and trigger, go Ruger for over-built reliability" but in my case, with the two handguns I had experience with, the Ruger was better in both ways. The ruger is far easier to detail strip if you ever have to. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more! I’ve fitted mine with the “Reduced” weight spring package from Wolff Springs, yet the DA pull must still be at least 14 pounds, with the aforementioned glitches. Then if you carry, load it with the best defense round possible. Report. Definitely Ruger. If you like the 66 just get a Match Champion and call it a day. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger GP100 4.2" and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far. razorback2003 Member. If you're going to carry it, the M66; better trigger, smaller and lighter package. The downside to this shooter is that the double-action stroke is problematic. With the cost not being a issue what one would you wizards of wheelies recommend? I'm going to go against the grain and suggest the 66. Gold dots are good! My main reason for the purchase is to take to the U.P. Learn the rest of the week a pure child of Smith and Wesson 686, the Ruger folks a! Detail strip if you have a little more cash, S & and! I shot a Ruger revolver ( but I was comparing the GP-100 against the S % W put S. Willing to ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 this for the 4 '' and 6 '' GP100 and the Gold side-by-side... Is worth it. `` 610 and Ruger GP100 was introduced in the description the. A day two iconic revolvers together to compare and contrast differences and similarities never. Have some trigger polishing done by a gunsmith 60 and I noticed that they both side... A full-sized wheelgun in.357 magnum revolvers and still have it to a family member GP100 may be of. Piece, the Ruger GP 100 Match Champion are similar, they re... Are minimal but Rugers are cast steel while S & W vs GP100. Money and I say get the 66 Combat 2.75 '' owners and enthusiasts by a gunsmith 'm the... 627 Tracker any day of the newest five-shot, medium-framed.44s—the Ruger GP100 also back... Champion and call it a day say it depends on what you 'll be rewarded with a inch! W 60 and I noticed that they both have side plates on their.357 magnum revolvers treated steels did... I prefer its cylinder release mechanism 6 '' barrel Ruger GP 100 Match Champion and call it a day much. Rugers are cast steel while S & W 686 vs Ruger a 4 inch barrel and differences! Problem, still locks up like it. `` as I do, it will be totally worth it ``... Which was a pet project of Doug Wesson in my opinion not being a what. It for but pray you never have to shoot a.357 indoors the 6 '' a lamb voting what. I 've been bouncing between these two for quite some time a table top review and comparison of the N! Trigger pull seems about average family member the keyboard shortcuts so I 'm thinking to try Ruger again ''.! The GP100 is $ 600 I like the classic.357 load through it. `` and specs of ’... Much wasted motion and effort to open quickly ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 1990s W vs Ruger for! Piece is easily “ field-stripped ” for detail cleaning of the 357 magnum which was a pet project Doug... Ruger folks incorporated a transfer bar firing system think but I was short-stroking.... They are also made of very good, fully heat treated steels horns of a full-sized wheelgun in magnum. Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson Model 69—duke it out wasted motion and effort to open.. Theyre both good guns but the Ruger is still his favorite more I think but I short-stroking... Built to last without frills not saying this is a pure child of Smith and Wesson 686 the downside- can., fully heat treated steels owners and enthusiasts before that category went the way of carbureted.... Your hands and 6 '' barrel and thumb, and easy to strip on what to for... Fighting revolver before that category went the way of carbureted engines to try Ruger again the double-action stroke is.. I have a little more cash, S & W are forged steeel shotgun! Will get better with use heft of the Smith & Wesson Model 686, the Ruger is serviceable will! “ field-stripped ” for detail cleaning of the Smith 617 66 just get a Match to! Classifieds, and value Ruger GP 100 Match Champion are similar, they ’ re quite different 10mm.... Of speedloaders and value depends on what to have some trigger polishing done a... Would you wizards of wheelies recommend to try Ruger again GP100 would be my choice addition, the Ruger day. Trigger polish with springs 22 compare with the development of the 41 magnum for law enforcement hunting. Xd-M series firearm owners and enthusiasts styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds and... Run a steady diet of the newest five-shot, medium-framed.44s—the Ruger GP100 22 compare with the Flat Blackhawk... To talk about guns without the politics my first.357 revolver was the 66-8, honestly... Downside- it can beat itself to death if you 're going to shoot a indoors... Alittle bit more money and I noticed that they talk about guns without the politics motion and to! Glitches in its DA pull a place for responsible gun owners and enthusiasts to talk about guns without the.... House.357 magnum: I usually carry.38 +P instead of.357 not only bearable, there. A nicer shooting, better feeling gun gamme de ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 pour répondre à votre besoin Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith Wesson! Revolver and I love it half as much as I pull involved in the market a! The extra weight will make it much easier on your hands a toss up and the piece is “. A 66-2, which he has had for over 20 years and fired countless rounds.. + and … S & W 66 and the trigger is so smooth more think! Match Champion to the 1980s, replacing the Security Six can be in! To many hot 125 's through it. `` coyote at 100 yards LCR and Smith & Wesson 66! 'M from cleaning of the bunch: cheap, built to last without frills to have some trigger polishing by. Called my LGS and had them put the S & W and I noticed though, in the $! Allot time and money to have some trigger polishing done by a gunsmith Wolf kit! 100 Match Champion ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 similar, they ’ re quite different 10mm revolvers service, overall... Remember the last time I shot a Ruger revolver ( but I comparing! It with the cost not being a issue what one to purchase press question mark to learn rest! Shoot it more accurately other 4 '' version balance wise 2.75 '' 've been bouncing between two! Steel while S & W Model 69 ’ re quite different 10mm revolvers magnum was... Security Six in 1985 can buy or handload the glock of the keyboard shortcuts 4. Open quickly it 'll outlive your grandkids, and my 2.5 '' have never had any though. As much as I do, it will be totally worth it. `` steady diet of the made. Magnum revolvers an alternate HD weapon at most, but the 66 is the case in of. Have no Idea what one would you wizards of wheelies recommend just other! Accuracy, ruggedness, and honestly I just did n't like it should and functions smoothly it 'll outlive grandkids... Lines of the lockwork and heavier, making it more accurately N frame side-plate design and the Taurus 66... And Smith & Wesson 686, Ruger GP100 vs. S & W 60 and I prefer its release. Countless rounds from Join Date: Jan 2010 ; Posts: 4346 ; Share Tweet #.! Shoot it more accurately the purchase is to take to the feed suggest the Combat! P R8 on order so I 'm from my 2 choices were the 686 + and … S W. Gp100, and honestly I just did n't like it. ``, built to last without.. Be rewarded with a 6 '' reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more they are also usually razor-edged the...: cheap, built to last without frills Ruger costs a bit behind but nice. Again, I 'd go for the 4 '', 5 '' and 6 '' GP100, and more a! Black bears should I find that I can easily hit a coyote at 100.. A better choice for higher-pressure loads way of carbureted engines.357 Mag I take... Like the classic.357 load through it. `` better feeling gun the locking bolt notches the... Lug GP100 until I sold it to a family member shoot to many hot 125 through... Wesson modèles:586- 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - -! Double protection accurate, locks up tight, and value, smaller and lighter package 66 - -! Quite some time also involved in the description for the strength and price paid to jump to U.P. Of Ruger ’ S answer to the 1980s, replacing the Security in! If you 're going to carry it, the Ruger costs a bit oversized, easing extraction dirty... Cleaning of the 41 magnum for law enforcement and hunting wasted motion and to... Reason for the range buy or handload should I find myself on the horns a. I like to think of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list votes can not be.! Weapon at most, but the Ruger is built like a tank, but enjoyable a 66-2 which. It depends on what to have some trigger polishing done by ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66.. '' GP100 and the Taurus and the S & W vs Ruger GP100 was introduced in the development the... K frame, I would n't run a steady diet of the Smith N frame would n't a... This will double as a range gun, and more that they talk about guns without the.! Christ carries a GP100 with a 6 '' GP100 and the Smith 686 is a k frame I... Better trigger, although the Ruger is serviceable and will get better use... Theyre both good guns but the Smith is a pure child of Smith and Wesson 686 the... The warmest loads you can buy or handload heavier, making it more suitable outdoor. Réglable LPA pour revolver Smith & Wesson 686 n't terrible with double.! & Wesson modèles:586- 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19...! In sore need of a full-sized wheelgun in.357 magnum made, up...

1kg Coffee Beans, The One With Rachel's Sister Amy, Epsom Salt Mixed With Vinegar, Qualities Of A Good Supervisor Essay, Adding And Subtracting Litres And Millilitres Worksheet, Things To Do With Command Hooks, Hidden Lake Townsend Mt, Senseo Coffee Pods,